Recently in my Early Childhood Education Capstone class (the final class) we discussed State Question 744 aka SQ 744. As a future teacher SQ 744 would of course affect the education system greatly in the state of Oklahoma. Now even though I won't be teaching in Oklahoma I still feel that I should have say, and although I can't vote on this issue I am hoping that those who can vote will truly read the facts before you hit the voting booth.
SQ 744 is a proposal by the Oklahoma Education Association (OEA) that would force the state to spend nearly a billion dollars more on education by cutting all other state agencies or raise your taxes by the same amount. State Question (SQ) 744 amends the Oklahoma Constitution and guarantees that the Oklahoma Legislature annually will provide an amount of funding for public schools that is at least equal to the average of the amount spent per pupil by the states surrounding Oklahoma (Kansas, Missouri, Arkansas, Texas, New Mexico and Colorado). In lamens terms the states surrounding OK spend more per child, and OK feels the need to compete with that. Now as a future educator of course I want the state to spend more money per child because that means the children of OK will be receiving a better education overall. But.......
The state doesn't have the funds to support this proposal so in order to finance it the state would have to cut 20% from each state agency. Here are some scary facts about cutting from each agency...
- a %20 cut for the Department of Corrections would mean 8,400 criminals let loose from prisons with 8 or 9 facilities being shut down.
- a %20 cut for Higher education would mean higher tuition, fewer class choices, and severe cuts in scholarship and student work opportunities.
- a %20 cut for the Health Care Authority would be a total of $539 million reduction in state health dollars.
- HCA would either need to reduce the number of people covered by SoonerCare, reduce benefits under SoonerCare or both.
- A 20% cut for Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services would mean either cutting services for the patients with the most severe problems so that the most people could be helped or cutting services to low-cost treatment for many people which could result in an increase in severe cases.
- A 20% cut for the Department of Public Safety would mean the elimination of 253 jobs.
Sorry this was long and boring but I needed to express my feelings on this issue and I hope those who have children in school in OK will truly learn more about the issue before voting in November.
Elizabeth
1 comments:
Elizabeth,
I would like to correct one item in your post. State Question 744 could NOT be changed after it is passed (unless there is another vote of the people). It is a change to the state's Constitution which is the strongest form of law there is. The wording of SQ 744 is clear: there is no funding mechanism to pay for the increased cost. By definition, it is an unfunded mandate. In my opinion it's the worst kind of unfunded mandate because no one knows how much it will cost next year or the year after that.
I work for a group called Oklahomans for Responsible Government which has created a website www.stop744.com which has a lot of the information you posted above. If you or any of your readers would like more information, feel free to contact me at peter@ofrg.org.
Peter J. Rudy
Oklahomans for Responsible Government
Post a Comment